UiPathFlow Evalboard
ADX dashboard↗

Skill agent dispute analyst

Passed
skill-agent-dispute-analyst · run 2026-04-22_20-39-58
Score
1.00
Duration
156.4s
Cost
$0.451
Final status
SUCCESS
Tool calls
15
uipath-agentse2elow-codeschemaprompt

Prompt

Create a UiPath solution "DisputeSol" containing a single low-code
agent "DisputeAnalystAgent".

The agent analyzes a billing dispute by synthesizing data from four
systems and producing a structured analysis.

Inputs (all required objects):
  - invoice           — extracted invoice fields
  - erpInvoice        — ERP contract, pricing, and payment history
  - customerContext   — CRM tier, health score, prior disputes
  - discrepancies     — computed discrepancy report
  - dispute           — customer-submitted dispute (description, etc.)

Output: a single object disputeAnalysis with these fields:
  - validity                  — enum: "invalid", "valid_low", "valid_high"
  - rootCause                 — enum: "pricing_mismatch", "tax_rate_error",
                                "tax_type_error", "duplicate_charge",
                                "missing_discount", "quantity_mismatch",
                                "no_discrepancy_found", "multiple"
  - rootCauseDetail           — string
  - recommendedResolution     — enum: "full_credit", "partial_credit",
                                "revised_invoice",
                                "credit_and_revised_invoice",
                                "reject_with_explanation"
  - recommendedCreditAmount   — number
  - confidenceScore           — number (0.0 to 1.0)
  - rationale                 — string
  - customerFacingExplanation — string
  - flags                     — array of strings

The system prompt must explicitly cover: the meaning of each validity
value, the confidence threshold convention (below 0.80 never
auto-approves), and how the agent chooses a root cause and
recommended resolution.

Do NOT publish, upload, or deploy. Do NOT ask for approval,
confirmation, or feedback. Do NOT pause between planning and
implementation. Complete the entire task end-to-end in a single pass.

Success criteria (7)

PASSAgent created the solution with uip solution newscore 1
Matched 1/1 required commands (filters: tool_name=Bash, pattern=/uip\s+solution\s+new/)
Examples: ['uip solution new "DisputeSol" --output json 2>&1']
PASSAgent scaffolded the agent project with uip agent initscore 1
Matched 1/1 required commands (filters: tool_name=Bash, pattern=/uip\s+agent\s+init/)
Examples: ['cd DisputeSol && uip agent init "DisputeAnalystAgent" --output json 2>&1']
PASSAgent linked the project to the solution with uip solution project addscore 1
Matched 2/1 required commands (filters: tool_name=Bash, pattern=/uip\s+solution\s+project\s+add/)
Examples: ['cd DisputeSol && uip solution project add "DisputeAnalystAgent" --output json 2>&1', 'uip solution project add "DisputeAnalystAgent" --output json 2>&1']
PASSAgent validated the projectscore 1
Matched 1/1 required commands (filters: tool_name=Bash, pattern=/uip\s+agent\s+validate/)
Examples: ['uip agent validate "DisputeAnalystAgent" --output json 2>&1']
PASSDisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json was createdscore 1
File 'DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json' exists
PASSDisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json was createdscore 1
File 'DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json' exists
PASSSchema sync, input/output field presence, contentTokens for all 5 inputs, and domain-specific system promptscore 1
Command: python3 $TASK_DIR/check_dispute_analyst_agent.py
Exit code: 0 (expected: 0)
Stdout:
OK: projectId is a UUID-shaped string (f5419357-d259-4574-991c-58ae0f9e13fc)
OK: inputSchema identical in agent.json and entry-points.json
OK: outputSchema identical in agent.json and entry-points.json
OK: inputSchema declares all 5 fields (invoice, erpInvoice, customerContext, discrepancies, dispute)
OK: outputSchema uses nested disputeAnalysis object
OK: outputSchema declares all 9 fields
OK: user message inlines all 5 inputs with matching contentTokens
OK: system prompt covers dispute-domain terms (['dispute', 'validity', 'confidence', 'root cause', 'credit'])

Stderr: (empty)

Command timeline (15)

agent tool calls in order
  1. 1.Skilluipath:uipath-agents
  2. 2.Read/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-agents/references/lowcode/quickstart.md
  3. 3.Read/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-agents/references/lowcode/agent-json-format.md
  4. 4.BashCheck uip binary and login status
  5. 5.BashCreate the DisputeSol solution
  6. 6.BashScaffold the DisputeAnalystAgent inside DisputeSol
  7. 7.BashLink agent to solution
  8. 8.BashCheck current directory contents
  9. 9.BashLink DisputeAnalystAgent to solution
  10. 10.Read/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/Disput…
  11. 11.Read/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/Disput…
  12. 12.Write/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/Disput…
  13. 13.Write/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/Disput…
  14. 14.BashValidate the DisputeAnalystAgent configuration
  15. 15.BashShow complete solution directory structure

Artifacts

task.log

23,502 bytes · click to view
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.criteria: Discovered 16 criterion checkers
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.criteria: Validated 16 criterion checkers
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: API routing: aws_bedrock
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Starting iteration 1/1
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Sending prompt: Create a UiPath solution "DisputeSol" containing a single low-code
agent "DisputeAnalystAgent".

The...
2026-04-22 20:39:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] Starting agent query stream...
2026-04-22 20:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] --- SYSTEM (hook_started): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_started', 'hook_id': '9d0618ab-e590-4a43-8ca0-a0f5ac819c21', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'uuid': 'a6e82d41-e449-4184-bb96-622
2026-04-22 20:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] --- SYSTEM (hook_started): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_started', 'hook_id': '81b74193-0c89-4d58-a085-428b9ed962a6', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'uuid': '0ffcef98-a7b4-458f-8d25-3ea
2026-04-22 20:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] --- SYSTEM (hook_response): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_response', 'hook_id': '81b74193-0c89-4d58-a085-428b9ed962a6', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'output': '', 'stdout': '', 'stderr
2026-04-22 20:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] --- SYSTEM (hook_response): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_response', 'hook_id': '9d0618ab-e590-4a43-8ca0-a0f5ac819c21', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'output': '@uipath/cli is already i
2026-04-22 20:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] --- SYSTEM (init): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'init', 'cwd': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst', 'session_id': 'dd6e4c
2026-04-22 20:40:09 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='The user wants me to create a UiPath solution "DisputeSol" containing a single low-code agent "DisputeAnalystAgent". This is a UiPath agents task, so I should use the uipath-ag
2026-04-22 20:40:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Skill | id=toolu_bdrk_01UURe7kwQH5KpJVZTavZMUR | params={
  "skill": "uipath:uipath-agents"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01UURe7kwQH5KpJVZTavZMUR | Launching skill: uipath:uipath-agents
2026-04-22 20:40:12 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='The user wants to create a UiPath solution "DisputeSol" containing a single low-code agent "DisputeAnalystAgent". Let me read the low-code quickstart first.', signature='EscCCk
2026-04-22 20:40:13 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_bdrk_011yEYfjaY4aNiE18CvTm8uh | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-agents/references/lowcode/quickstart.md"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:13 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_011yEYfjaY4aNiE18CvTm8uh |      1→# UiPath Low-Code Agent Authoring — Quickstart
     2→
     3→## When to Use
     4→
     5→- Create a new low-code agent project (standalone or inline in a flow)
     6→- Edit `agent.json` — prompts, model, schemas, settings, resources
     7→- Add tools to an agent: RPA processes, other agents, Integration Service connections
     8→- Add RAG contexts (semantic index) and escalations (human-in-the-loop)
     9→- Wire agent-to-agent calls within a solution or to an external deployed agent
    10→- Design input/output schemas and sync with `entry-points.json`
    11→- Validate agent project structure
    12→- Publish agent to Studio Web, pack and deploy to Orchestrator
    13→
    14→## Critical Rules
    15→
    16→1. **Edit JSON files directly** — the CLI supports `init` (scaffold…(14508 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:40:15 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Let me read the agent-json-format.md to understand the full schema before I start creating files.', signature='EosCCkgIDRABGAIqQBzVBDXrMxAgEP1ZYCuiHC9FSSGRsErrrIsIBHXwnfPGgkK9s
2026-04-22 20:40:16 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_bdrk_01WQaTJaa2apCEh27x7nsz6j | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-agents/references/lowcode/agent-json-format.md"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:16 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01WQaTJaa2apCEh27x7nsz6j |      1→# Agent JSON Format Reference
     2→
     3→Schemas for the core agent definition files.
     4→
     5→## Project Directory Structure
     6→
     7→After `uip agent init <name>`:
     8→
     9→```
    10→<AgentName>/
    11→├── agent.json              # Main agent configuration (edit this)
    12→├── entry-points.json       # Entry point definition (must mirror agent.json schemas)
    13→├── project.uiproj          # Project metadata
    14→├── flow-layout.json        # UI layout — do not edit
    15→├── evals/                  # Evaluation sets and evaluators
    16→├── features/               # Agent features
    17→└── resources/              # Agent resources
    18→```
    19→
    20→## agent.json
    21→
    22→Primary configuration file. Edit directly.
    23→
    24→```j…(14692 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:40:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Now I have a good understanding of the low-code agent format. Let me proceed with creating the solution and agent.\n\nFirst, let me check if `uip` is available.', signature='Es
2026-04-22 20:40:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Now I have everything I need. Let me create the solution and scaffold the agent.
2026-04-22 20:40:21 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_0167wxrkRRhAXzJtCZGBMvcX | params={
  "command": "which uip && uip login status --output json 2>&1 | head -5",
  "description": "Check uip binary and login status"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:22 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_0167wxrkRRhAXzJtCZGBMvcX | /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/.venv/bin/uip
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "LogIn",
  "Data": {
    "Status": "Logged in",
2026-04-22 20:40:26 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_01PfKUjt8MmuwYKY7hh4JDfq | params={
  "command": "uip solution new \"DisputeSol\" --output json 2>&1",
  "description": "Create the DisputeSol solution"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:27 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01PfKUjt8MmuwYKY7hh4JDfq | {
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "SolutionNew",
  "Data": {
    "Status": "Created successfully",
    "Path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeSol.uipx"
  }
}
2026-04-22 20:40:30 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_01JNCXskuxBdztrNhBxBi2cD | params={
  "command": "cd DisputeSol && uip agent init \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" --output json 2>&1",
  "description": "Scaffold the DisputeAnalystAgent inside DisputeSol"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:32 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01JNCXskuxBdztrNhBxBi2cD | {
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "AgentInit",
  "Data": {
    "Status": "Agent project created",
    "Path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent",
    "Name": "DisputeAnalystAgent",
    "Model": "gpt-4o-2024-11-20",
    "ProjectId": "f5419357-d259-4574-991c-58ae0f9e13fc",
    "NextSteps": "# Edit agent.json to configure prompts and resources\n# Then link to a solution:\nuip solution new \"<SolutionName>\"\nuip solution project add \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" <SolutionName>.uipx\n# Or if the solution already exists:\nuip solution project add \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" <existing>.uipx\n# Validate after editing:\nuip agent validate \"DisputeAnalystAgent\"\n# Bundle and upl…(105 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:40:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_012XznnAt3xqWcdUmMFHokKE | params={
  "command": "cd DisputeSol && uip solution project add \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" --output json 2>&1",
  "description": "Link agent to solution"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_bdrk_012XznnAt3xqWcdUmMFHokKE | Exit code 1
(eval):cd:1: no such file or directory: DisputeSol
2026-04-22 20:40:36 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_01U7XZvUDy6s8auaRd7u2icL | params={
  "command": "ls",
  "description": "Check current directory contents"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:36 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01U7XZvUDy6s8auaRd7u2icL | DisputeAnalystAgent
DisputeSol.uipx
2026-04-22 20:40:38 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_01153SqbNmQKTqknp3xRYEQq | params={
  "command": "uip solution project add \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" --output json 2>&1",
  "description": "Link DisputeAnalystAgent to solution"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:44 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01153SqbNmQKTqknp3xRYEQq | 2026-04-22 20:40:38 INFO  [ResourceBuilder:ProjectCreateCommandHandler] Creating project [object Object]
2026-04-22 20:40:38 INFO  [ResourceBuilder:MultiFileSolutionDefinitionProvider] Reading multi-file solution definition for solution %s /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol
2026-04-22 20:40:38 INFO  [ResourceBuilder:ProjectCreateCommandHandler] Generate artefact resources for project [object Object]
2026-04-22 20:40:38 INFO  [ResourceBuilder:SolutionsMetadataReader] Reading metadata from %s. SolutionsMetadataReader
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "ProjectAdd",
  "Data": {
    "Status": "Added successfully",
    "Project": "DisputeAnalystAgent/project.uiproj",
    "Solution": "/User…(159 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:40:46 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Now let me read the scaffolded agent.json to understand what was generated.', signature='EvUBCkgIDRABGAIqQFvTYt+QfuEa8hdDg31XiA6QRXc6rO9ry5xEy7ZslQOSBkKXLLLPF4PesTk1dHxS4dE94YC
2026-04-22 20:40:47 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Good. Now let me read the scaffolded files before editing.
2026-04-22 20:40:48 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_bdrk_01AC5j1f1JfLr2iUdavRs9Up | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:48 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_bdrk_01Hr7sAZFTbbmusEj5TDTU6y | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json"
}
2026-04-22 20:40:48 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01AC5j1f1JfLr2iUdavRs9Up |      1→{
     2→  "version": "1.1.0",
     3→  "settings": {
     4→    "model": "gpt-4o-2024-11-20",
     5→    "maxTokens": 16384,
     6→    "temperature": 0,
     7→    "engine": "basic-v2",
     8→    "maxIterations": 25,
     9→    "mode": "standard"
    10→  },
    11→  "inputSchema": {
    12→    "type": "object",
    13→    "properties": {
    14→      "input": {
    15→        "type": "string",
    16→        "description": "User input"
    17→      }
    18→    },
    19→    "required": [
    20→      "input"
    21→    ]
    22→  },
    23→  "outputSchema": {
    24→    "type": "object",
    25→    "properties": {
    26→      "content": {
    27→        "type": "string",
    28→        "description": "Agent response"
    29→      }
    30→    }
    31→  },
    32→  "metadata":…(1236 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:40:48 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01Hr7sAZFTbbmusEj5TDTU6y |      1→{
     2→  "$schema": "https://cloud.uipath.com/draft/2024-12/entry-point",
     3→  "$id": "entry-points.json",
     4→  "entryPoints": [
     5→    {
     6→      "filePath": "/content/agent.json",
     7→      "uniqueId": "78fed745-8d84-4dab-bbd5-cc7747948059",
     8→      "type": "agent",
     9→      "input": {
    10→        "type": "object",
    11→        "properties": {
    12→          "input": {
    13→            "type": "string",
    14→            "description": "User input"
    15→          }
    16→        },
    17→        "required": [
    18→          "input"
    19→        ]
    20→      },
    21→      "output": {
    22→        "type": "object",
    23→        "properties": {
    24→          "content": {
    25→            "type": "string",
    26→           …(464 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:41:01 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Now I need to write the full `agent.json` with:\n1. Model set to `anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6`\n2. System prompt covering all the required details\n3. User message template wit
2026-04-22 20:41:01 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Now I'll write the complete `agent.json` with full schema, system prompt, and user message template.
2026-04-22 20:41:52 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Write | id=toolu_bdrk_017QMAhXgDh1DeNNHkLPBYd2 | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json",
  "content": "{\n  \"version\": \"1.1.0\",\n  \"settings\": {\n    \"model\": \"anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6\",\n    \"maxTokens\": 16384,\n    \"temperature\": 0,\n    \"engine\": \"basic-v2\",\n    \"maxIterations\": 25,\n    \"mode\": \"standard\"\n  },\n  \"inputSchema\": {\n    \"type\": \"object\",\n    \"properties\": {\n      \"invoice\": {\n        \"type\": \"object\",\n        \"description\": \"Extracted invoice fields from the customer-facing invoice (line items, amounts, taxes, dates, invoice number, etc.)\"\n      },\n      \"erpInvoice\": {\n        \"type\": \"object\",\n        \"des…(16939 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:41:52 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_017QMAhXgDh1DeNNHkLPBYd2 | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json has been updated successfully.
2026-04-22 20:41:54 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Now update `entry-points.json` to mirror the schemas exactly:
2026-04-22 20:42:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Write | id=toolu_bdrk_014hbFfVZo8CvnFJqNqbv5DD | params={
  "file_path": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json",
  "content": "{\n  \"$schema\": \"https://cloud.uipath.com/draft/2024-12/entry-point\",\n  \"$id\": \"entry-points.json\",\n  \"entryPoints\": [\n    {\n      \"filePath\": \"/content/agent.json\",\n      \"uniqueId\": \"78fed745-8d84-4dab-bbd5-cc7747948059\",\n      \"type\": \"agent\",\n      \"input\": {\n        \"type\": \"object\",\n        \"properties\": {\n          \"invoice\": {\n            \"type\": \"object\",\n            \"description\": \"Extracted invoice fields from the customer-facing invoice (line items, amounts, taxes, dates, invoice number, etc.)\"\n          },\n       …(4065 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:42:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_014hbFfVZo8CvnFJqNqbv5DD | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json has been updated successfully.
2026-04-22 20:42:12 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Now validate the agent:
2026-04-22 20:42:13 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_01Xb6emLmPRhFg9HDv6fvev1 | params={
  "command": "uip agent validate \"DisputeAnalystAgent\" --output json 2>&1",
  "description": "Validate the DisputeAnalystAgent configuration"
}
2026-04-22 20:42:14 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_01Xb6emLmPRhFg9HDv6fvev1 | {
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "AgentValidation",
  "Data": {
    "Status": "Valid",
    "ProjectDir": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/DisputeSol/DisputeAnalystAgent",
    "Model": "anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-6",
    "StorageVersion": "44.0.0",
    "MigrationApplied": false,
    "Validated": {
      "agent": true,
      "resources": 0,
      "evalSets": 1,
      "evaluators": 2
    },
    "AgentBuilderGenerated": true,
    "AgentBuilderFiles": 3
  }
}
2026-04-22 20:42:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: Validation passed. Let me confirm the final file structure:
2026-04-22 20:42:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_bdrk_013SVb6Gkntc42a8mpJf4jLj | params={
  "command": "find . -not -path './.git/*' | sort",
  "description": "Show complete solution directory structure"
}
2026-04-22 20:42:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_bdrk_013SVb6Gkntc42a8mpJf4jLj | .
./DisputeAnalystAgent
./DisputeAnalystAgent/.agent-builder
./DisputeAnalystAgent/.agent-builder/agent.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/.agent-builder/bindings.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/.agent-builder/entry-points.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals/eval-sets
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals/eval-sets/evaluation-set-default.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals/evaluators
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals/evaluators/evaluator-default-trajectory.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/evals/evaluators/evaluator-default.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/features
./DisputeAnalystAgent/flow-layout.json
./DisputeAnalystAgent/project.uiproj
./DisputeAnalystAgent/resources
./DisputeSol.uipx
./resources
./resources/solution_folder
./resourc…(232 more chars)
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] >>> ASSISTANT: The solution is complete and validated. Here's a summary:

---

## Completion Report

### Files Created / Modified

| File | Action |
|---|---|
| `DisputeSol.uipx` | Created — solution manifest |
| `DisputeAnalystAgent/agent.json` | Configured — model, system prompt, user message, full input/output schemas |
| `DisputeAnalystAgent/entry-points.json` | Configured — mirrors `agent.json` schemas exactly |
| `DisputeAnalystAgent/project.uiproj` | Scaffolded by `uip agent init` |
| `DisputeAnalystAge
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] <<< RESULT: cost=$0.4513728000000001, usage={'input_tokens': 17, 'cache_creation_input_tokens': 46342, 'cache_read_input_tokens': 507431, 'output_tokens': 8354, 'server_tool_use': {'web_search_requests': 0, 'web_fetch_requests': 0}, 'service_ti
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] session_id changed: None -> dd6e4c22-4a1b-4e75-aa97-dd42d356ec74
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: [coder] Agent query stream ended
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Agent response received (5017 chars)
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Checking success criteria
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'command_executed' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'command_executed' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'command_executed' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'command_executed' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'file_exists' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'file_exists' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.criteria.run_command: Running command for criterion 'Schema sync, input/output field presence, contentTokens for all 5 inputs, and domain-specific system prompt': python3 $TASK_DIR/check_dispute_analyst_agent.py
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.sandbox: Command 'python3 $TASK_DIR/check_dispute_analyst_agent.py' exited with code 0
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.sandbox: STDOUT:
---
OK: projectId is a UUID-shaped string (f5419357-d259-4574-991c-58ae0f9e13fc)
OK: inputSchema identical in agent.json and entry-points.json
OK: outputSchema identical in agent.json and entry-points.json
OK: inputSchema declares all 5 fields (invoice, erpInvoice, customerContext, discrepancies, dispute)
OK: outputSchema uses nested disputeAnalysis object
OK: outputSchema declares all 9 fields
OK: user message inlines all 5 inputs with matching contentTokens
OK: system prompt covers dispute-domain terms (['dispute', 'validity', 'confidence', 'root cause', 'credit'])
---
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'run_command' score: 1.00
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Success criteria: 7/7 passed, weighted score: 1.000
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: All success criteria passed!
2026-04-22 20:42:33 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Running post-run command: python3 $SKILLS_REPO_PATH/tests/tasks/uipath-maestro-flow/_shared/cleanup_solutions.py
2026-04-22 20:42:34 [WARNING] coder_eval.orchestrator: [post_run stderr] cleanup_solutions: failed to delete 40269502-b038-43e9-a559-31091556321d (exit 1):
2026-04-22 20:42:34 [WARNING] coder_eval.orchestrator: [post_run stderr] cleanup_solutions: summary policy=always deleted=0 preserved=0 skipped=0 failed=1
2026-04-22 20:42:34 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Sandbox preserved (in-place): runs/2026-04-22_20-39-58/default/skill-agent-dispute-analyst/00/artifacts/skill-agent-dispute-analyst