UiPathFlow Evalboard
ADX dashboard

Skill hitl e2e multi hitl brownfield

Passed
skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield · run 2026-04-19_12-09-06
Score
1.00
Duration
528.1s
Cost
$1.067
Final status
SUCCESS
Tool calls
30
uipath-human-in-the-loope2ebrown-fieldmulti-hitlhr-onboarding

Prompt

I have an HR onboarding flow. Create it by writing to
HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow:

{
  "nodes": [
    {"id": "trigger1", "type": "core.trigger.manual", "label": "New Hire Request", "position": {"x": 100, "y": 300}},
    {"id": "fetchDocs", "type": "core.action.script", "label": "Fetch Documents", "position": {"x": 300, "y": 300}, "inputs": {"script": "// fetch submitted docs"}},
    {"id": "validateDocs", "type": "core.action.script", "label": "Validate Documents", "position": {"x": 500, "y": 300}, "inputs": {"script": "// validate doc completeness"}},
    {"id": "provisionIT", "type": "core.action.script", "label": "Provision IT Access", "position": {"x": 700, "y": 300}, "inputs": {"script": "// create accounts"}},
    {"id": "sendWelcome", "type": "core.action.script", "label": "Send Welcome Email", "position": {"x": 900, "y": 300}, "inputs": {"script": "// send welcome"}}
  ],
  "edges": [
    {"id": "e1", "source": "trigger1", "target": "fetchDocs", "sourcePort": "output", "targetPort": "input"},
    {"id": "e2", "source": "fetchDocs", "target": "validateDocs", "sourcePort": "output", "targetPort": "input"},
    {"id": "e3", "source": "validateDocs", "target": "provisionIT", "sourcePort": "output", "targetPort": "input"},
    {"id": "e4", "source": "provisionIT", "target": "sendWelcome", "sourcePort": "output", "targetPort": "input"}
  ],
  "variables": [],
  "definitions": []
}

Add human validation at TWO points:
1. Before document validation — an HR officer must review submitted documents
2. Before IT provisioning — a manager must approve IT access

Wire the completed handles for both HITL nodes to their respective downstream
steps. Validate the full flow after both nodes are added.

Save results to report.json:
{
  "hitl_nodes": [
    {"id": "<first HITL node id>", "label": "<label>", "before": "<node it precedes>"},
    {"id": "<second HITL node id>", "label": "<label>", "before": "<node it precedes>"}
  ],
  "handles_wired": ["<list of all edges added>"],
  "validation_passed": true
}

Success criteria (4)

PASSHITL node(s) present in the flow filescore 1
Includes: 1/1 found; Score: 1.00
PASSCompleted handles wired in the flow filescore 1
Includes: 1/1 found; Score: 1.00
PASSAgent validated the flow after all changesscore 1
Matched 1/1 required commands (filters: tool_name=Bash, pattern=/uip\s+flow\s+validate.*--format\s+json/)
Examples: ['cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-h']
PASSreport.json shows 2 HITL nodes and validation passedscore 1
Assertions: 2/2 passed; Score: 1.00

Command timeline (30)

agent tool calls in order
  1. 1.Skilluipath:uipath-human-in-the-loop
  2. 2.BashResolve uip binary and check version
  3. 3.Read/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-human-in-the-loop/references/hitl-node-quickform.md
  4. 4.BashCheck working directory contents
  5. 5.BashCreate directory structure for HROnboarding flow
  6. 6.Write/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  7. 7.BashValidate the HROnboarding flow with uip
  8. 8.BashValidate the HROnboarding flow without --format flag
  9. 9.Edit/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  10. 10.BashRe-validate after fixing variables format
  11. 11.BashCreate test flow to inspect expected file format
  12. 12.Write/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  13. 13.BashValidate the rewritten flow
  14. 14.BashValidate init-generated flow to confirm baseline passes
  15. 15.BashTest minimal HITL node addition to identify the failing field
  16. 16.BashCheck available flow subcommands
  17. 17.BashTest with bare minimum HITL node (no special inputs)
  18. 18.BashCheck flow node subcommands
  19. 19.BashTest HITL node with minimal schema to isolate failing field
  20. 20.BashTest with full HITL inputs including channels, recipient, fields, and definition
  21. 21.BashTest with core.action.script definition and variables.nodes to find culprit
  22. 22.BashCheck node add command options
  23. 23.Read/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  24. 24.Edit/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  25. 25.BashValidate after fixing entryPointId UUID
  26. 26.BashTest edge format with sourceNodeId/targetNodeId
  27. 27.BashTest source/target edge format with real edge
  28. 28.Edit/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…
  29. 29.BashValidate flow after fixing edge key names
  30. 30.Write/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-br…

Artifacts

task.log

36,050 bytes · click to view
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [DEBUG] coder_eval.criteria: Criteria already discovered, skipping
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [DEBUG] coder_eval.criteria: Validated 13 criterion checkers
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: API routing: anthropic_direct
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Starting iteration 1/2
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Sending prompt: I have an HR onboarding flow. Create it by writing to
HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow:

...
2026-04-19 12:37:03 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: Starting agent query stream...
2026-04-19 12:37:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: --- SYSTEM (hook_started): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_started', 'hook_id': '780a9b75-69c6-4127-ae50-22b225b12590', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'uuid': '5d03e1e3-b9bc-463b-85df-dc7
2026-04-19 12:37:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: --- SYSTEM (hook_response): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'hook_response', 'hook_id': '780a9b75-69c6-4127-ae50-22b225b12590', 'hook_name': 'SessionStart:startup', 'hook_event': 'SessionStart', 'output': '@uipath/cli is already i
2026-04-19 12:37:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: --- SYSTEM (init): {'type': 'system', 'subtype': 'init', 'cwd': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield', 'sessi
2026-04-19 12:37:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='The user wants me to create an HR onboarding flow with HITL (Human-in-the-Loop) nodes. This involves using the UiPath HITL skill. Let me invoke it.', signature='EtECClsIDBgCKkB
2026-04-19 12:37:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Skill | id=toolu_01EbdJPYmoR11j6NcuqvvHLt | params={'skill': 'uipath:uipath-human-in-the-loop'}
2026-04-19 12:37:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01EbdJPYmoR11j6NcuqvvHLt | Launching skill: uipath:uipath-human-in-the-loop
2026-04-19 12:37:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: --- RateLimitEvent: RateLimitEvent(rate_limit_info=RateLimitInfo(status='allowed', resets_at=1776643200, rate_limit_type='five_hour', utilization=None, overage_status='allowed', overage_resets_at=1777593600, overage_disa
2026-04-19 12:37:26 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Let me start by following the skill's instructions. I'll work through the steps:\n\n1. First, resolve the `uip` binary\n2. The user has already specified the flow file path and
2026-04-19 12:37:27 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_012DxFoZJ7UgQJjxMbypqU1C | params={'command': 'UIP=$(command -v uip 2>/dev/null || echo "$(npm root -g 2>/dev/null | sed \'s|/node_modules$||\')/bin/uip") && echo "UIP=$UIP" && $UIP --version', 'description': 'Resolve uip binary and check version'}
2026-04-19 12:37:28 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_01Y5YuJKHBpqmVMqpusd834x | params={'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/skills/skills/uipath-human-in-the-loop/references/hitl-node-quickform.md'}
2026-04-19 12:37:28 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_012DxFoZJ7UgQJjxMbypqU1C | UIP=/Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip
0.3.1
2026-04-19 12:37:28 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01Y5YuJKHBpqmVMqpusd834x |      1→# HITL QuickForm Node — Direct JSON Reference
     2→
     3→The agent writes the `uipath.human-in-the-loop` node directly into the `.flow` file as JSON. No CLI command needed to add the node.
     4→
     5→---
     6→
     7→## Full Node JSON
     8→
     9→```json
    10→{
    11→  "id": "
2026-04-19 12:38:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Now I have all the information I need. Let me:\n\n1. Create the directory structure for the flow file\n2. Write the base flow file with the provided JSON\n3. Add two HITL nodes
2026-04-19 12:38:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Good — `uip` is at `~/.bun/bin/uip` (v0.3.1). Now let me check the working directory and create the flow file structure.
2026-04-19 12:38:21 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01MGQi4oDZaCof6WsRUinQgE | params={'command': 'ls /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/ 2>/dev/null || echo "dir does not exist"', 'description': 'Check working directory contents'}
2026-04-19 12:38:21 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01MGQi4oDZaCof6WsRUinQgE | (Bash completed with no output)
2026-04-19 12:38:24 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_013bQSWAw1kfVmpnWeWZB3J3 | params={'command': 'mkdir -p "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding" && echo "created"', 'description': 'Create directory structure for HROnboarding flow'}
2026-04-19 12:38:24 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_013bQSWAw1kfVmpnWeWZB3J3 | created
2026-04-19 12:39:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Now I'll write the complete flow file with:\n1. The base nodes from the user's specification\n2. Two HITL nodes: hrDocReview1 and managerItApproval1\n3. End nodes for cancelled
2026-04-19 12:39:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Now I'll write the complete flow file with the two HITL nodes inserted and properly wired.
2026-04-19 12:39:32 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Write | id=toolu_01LfoiLvFmiuVmgYB3SWRfNn | params={'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow', 'content': '{\n  "nodes": [\n    {"id": "trigger1", "type": "core.trigger.manual", "label": "
2026-04-19 12:39:32 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01LfoiLvFmiuVmgYB3SWRfNn | File created successfully at: /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow
2026-04-19 12:39:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Now validate the flow:
2026-04-19 12:39:36 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01GBmGRKuQXCBqeEjY7ecCHm | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow --format json 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate th
2026-04-19 12:39:37 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_01GBmGRKuQXCBqeEjY7ecCHm | Exit code 3
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "ValidationError",
  "Message": "error: unknown option '--format'",
  "Instructions": "Check command arguments and options. Use --help for usage information."
}
2026-04-19 12:39:40 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01HFHczMAmqcsMEpSwKGCL39 | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate the HROnboarding
2026-04-19 12:39:41 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_01HFHczMAmqcsMEpSwKGCL39 | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/H
2026-04-19 12:39:56 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='There\'s a schema validation error: "Invalid input: expected string, received undefined". This likely means there\'s a required field that\'s undefined. Let me look at the flow
2026-04-19 12:39:57 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The schema error points to `variables` format (object vs. array) or a missing required string. Let me fix the `variables` structure to match what the validator expects:
2026-04-19 12:40:02 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Edit | id=toolu_01VisCMpk4nuRVMjro9fJg9S | params={'replace_all': False, 'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow', 'old_string': '  "variables": {\n    "nodes": [\n      {\n        "id":
2026-04-19 12:40:02 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01VisCMpk4nuRVMjro9fJg9S | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow has been updated successfully.
2026-04-19 12:40:05 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01CMPjpxpyZPJGY9Wv6rt3xs | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Re-validate after fixing 
2026-04-19 12:40:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_01CMPjpxpyZPJGY9Wv6rt3xs | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/H
2026-04-19 12:40:11 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Still the same error. Let me try running the uip flow validate with verbose output or check the help to understand what format is expected. Or let me try to see what the uip fl
2026-04-19 12:40:12 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Let me create a test flow with `uip flow init` to see the expected format, then compare:
2026-04-19 12:40:13 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01Vc4AwKyCQ23FQLyMr3gRm4 | params={'command': 'cd /tmp && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow init TestFlow 2>&1 && cat TestFlow/TestFlow/TestFlow.flow 2>/dev/null || find TestFlow -name "*.flow" -exec cat {} \\;', 'description': 'Create test flow to inspect expected file format'}
2026-04-19 12:40:14 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01Vc4AwKyCQ23FQLyMr3gRm4 | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Failed to create flow project",
  "Instructions": "Directory \"TestFlow\" already exists and is not empty. Use --force to overwrite."
}
{
  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",
  "versi
2026-04-19 12:40:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Now I can see the actual format of the `.flow` file. Key differences from what I wrote:\n\n1. The file has a top-level `id` (UUID), `version`, and `name` field\n2. `variables` 
2026-04-19 12:40:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The real format requires `id`, `version`, `name` at the top level, `bindings: []`, `variables: {}` (empty object), and `metadata`. All nodes need `typeVersion`, `ui.position.size`, `display.label`, proper `inputs/outputs`. Let me rewrite the full flow correctly:
2026-04-19 12:41:15 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Write | id=toolu_0134boTE8E9g5XnFVWjSFZTZ | params={'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow', 'content': '{\n  "id": "c1d2e3f4-a5b6-7890-cdef-123456789abc",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "nam
2026-04-19 12:41:15 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_0134boTE8E9g5XnFVWjSFZTZ | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow has been updated successfully.
2026-04-19 12:41:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_011UNYfMVfenRsgPu3vLTf7p | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate the rewritten fl
2026-04-19 12:41:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_011UNYfMVfenRsgPu3vLTf7p | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/H
2026-04-19 12:41:22 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Still the same error. The error "Invalid input: expected string, received undefined" is very generic. Let me try to narrow this down by testing with just the init flow file fro
2026-04-19 12:41:23 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Let me narrow down the exact failing field by testing the init-generated file and then adding elements one by one:
2026-04-19 12:41:24 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01TEFdNyYEamF5BNzRkB65Eq | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate /tmp/TestFlow/TestFlow/TestFlow.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate init-generated flow to 
2026-04-19 12:41:25 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01TEFdNyYEamF5BNzRkB65Eq | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/TestFlow/TestFlow/TestFlow.flow",
    "Status": "Valid"
  }
}
2026-04-19 12:41:28 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Good, the init-generated flow passes. Now let me add the HITL node to the init flow to see if that passes, and then figure out what's failing in my file.\n\nLet me create a min
2026-04-19 12:41:29 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Good — the baseline passes. Let me test adding a HITL node to the init file to isolate the issue:
2026-04-19 12:41:55 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_018gUSGMtwcHE572bGbvzdw2 | params={'command': 'cat > /tmp/test_hitl.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n      "typeVersion": "1.0.0",\n      "ui": {\n        "position": {"x"
2026-04-19 12:41:57 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_018gUSGMtwcHE572bGbvzdw2 | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /tmp/test_hitl.flow",
  "Instructions": "Found 1 error(s):\n  - [error] [(root)] Schema validation failed: Invalid input: expected string, received undefined"
}
2026-04-19 12:42:00 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='Even the simplified HITL test file fails. Let me try an even simpler approach: add just the HITL node definition to the definitions, without the node itself, to isolate the iss
2026-04-19 12:42:01 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Let me check if there's a CLI command to add HITL nodes, and inspect what the validator expects for HITL node fields:
2026-04-19 12:42:02 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01WehC8T7WC2pjf1jne5veCB | params={'command': '/Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow --help 2>&1 | head -40', 'description': 'Check available flow subcommands'}
2026-04-19 12:42:13 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01WehC8T7WC2pjf1jne5veCB | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "Help",
  "Data": {
    "Command": "flow",
    "Description": "Create, debug, and run UiPath Flow projects and jobs.",
    "Usage": "uip flow [options] [command]",
    "Arguments": [],
    "Options"
2026-04-19 12:42:14 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01NA2dLaKR78GazDHq3ZXJ3T | params={'command': '# Test with absolutely minimal HITL node - strip down the inputs to bare minimum\ncat > /tmp/test_hitl2.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigg
2026-04-19 12:42:15 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01NA2dLaKR78GazDHq3ZXJ3T | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/test_hitl2.flow",
    "Status": "Valid",
    "Warnings": "1 warning(s):\n  - [nodes[hrDocReview1].type] Node type \"uipath.human-in-the-loop:1.0.0\" has
2026-04-19 12:42:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="I found two important things:\n1. The bare HITL node validates with a warning about the missing definition.\n2. There are `node` and `edge` subcommands!\n\nThe validation passe
2026-04-19 12:42:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The bare HITL node passes! The issue is in the `inputs` schema. Let me check the `node` subcommand and also isolate the exact failing field:
2026-04-19 12:42:21 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01XqDdVhKTYq6mLcjtWdj2n2 | params={'command': '/Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow node --help 2>&1', 'description': 'Check flow node subcommands'}
2026-04-19 12:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01XqDdVhKTYq6mLcjtWdj2n2 | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "Help",
  "Data": {
    "Command": "node",
    "Description": "Manage nodes in a Flow file",
    "Usage": "uip flow node [options] [command]",
    "Arguments": [],
    "Options": [
      {
        "
2026-04-19 12:42:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01SMR8kZMuRcseKbsjcugqJt | params={'command': '# Test with HITL node that has inputs.type set but no schema\ncat > /tmp/test_hitl3.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n      "
2026-04-19 12:42:34 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01SMR8kZMuRcseKbsjcugqJt | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/test_hitl3.flow",
    "Status": "Valid",
    "Warnings": "1 warning(s):\n  - [nodes[hrDocReview1].type] Node type \"uipath.human-in-the-loop:1.0.0\" has
2026-04-19 12:42:42 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="The HITL node with the `inputs.type`, `timeout`, `priority`, and `schema` validates correctly (with a warning about missing definition). The issue was in my original file.\n\nN
2026-04-19 12:42:42 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The issue is in the full inputs. Let me progressively add fields to identify exactly which property fails:
2026-04-19 12:43:02 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_019tyvWTKXBbSJAqhjKPMRDP | params={'command': '# Test with channels + recipient added\ncat > /tmp/test_hitl4.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n      "typeVersion": "1.0.0",
2026-04-19 12:43:04 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_019tyvWTKXBbSJAqhjKPMRDP | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/test_hitl4.flow",
    "Status": "Valid"
  }
}
2026-04-19 12:43:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='This passes. So the issue is something else in my original file. Let me now compare my original file with this working test file and identify the differences.\n\nLooking at the
2026-04-19 12:43:11 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The flow validates. The issue was in the `core.action.script` definition or `variables.nodes` in my full flow file. Let me build the complete HROnboarding flow from this working foundation:
2026-04-19 12:43:23 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01XCceHcahNpnmEPRvqNCLbX | params={'command': '# Test adding core.action.script definition and variables.nodes\ncat > /tmp/test_hitl5.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n    
2026-04-19 12:43:25 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01XCceHcahNpnmEPRvqNCLbX | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/test_hitl5.flow",
    "Status": "Valid"
  }
}
2026-04-19 12:43:36 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='So both `core.action.script` definition and `variables.nodes` are valid. Let me now try to add input fields with `binding` (the input direction fields) since those were in my o
2026-04-19 12:43:37 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Now let me use the `uip flow node add` CLI to properly add the HITL nodes to an init-created flow, then build up from there:
2026-04-19 12:43:38 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_011L8nRdU7oy3UJUBNJsWLUR | params={'command': '/Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow node add --help 2>&1', 'description': 'Check node add command options'}
2026-04-19 12:43:39 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_011L8nRdU7oy3UJUBNJsWLUR | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "Help",
  "Data": {
    "Command": "add",
    "Description": "Add a node to a Flow file.\nFor connector nodes (type uipath.connector), do NOT pass --input here — run 'node configure' afterwards to s
2026-04-19 12:43:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="I can use `uip flow node add` to add HITL nodes! Let me:\n\n1. First, write the base flow with the original nodes\n2. Use `uip flow node add` to add the HITL nodes with the rig
2026-04-19 12:43:59 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Let me read the current HROnboarding.flow to spot differences from the validated test:
2026-04-19 12:44:00 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Read | id=toolu_01535JdArEksUZfvZgudJc2X | params={'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow'}
2026-04-19 12:44:00 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01535JdArEksUZfvZgudJc2X |      1→{
     2→  "id": "c1d2e3f4-a5b6-7890-cdef-123456789abc",
     3→  "version": "1.0.0",
     4→  "name": "HROnboarding",
     5→  "nodes": [
     6→    {
     7→      "id": "trigger1",
     8→      "type": "core.trigger.manual",
     9→      "typeVersion": "1.0.0",
    10→      "display": {"lab
2026-04-19 12:44:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='I see - the `variables` field in my current file is `{"nodes": [...]}` (an object with a `nodes` array), but in the passing test (test_hitl5) I also used `{"nodes": [...]}`. Le
2026-04-19 12:44:17 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: I see the issue — `entryPointId: "entry1"` is not a valid UUID. The validator likely requires a UUID format for that field. Let me fix it:
2026-04-19 12:44:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Edit | id=toolu_01L1cKSgoutcntkhjSpDByVR | params={'replace_all': False, 'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow', 'old_string': '      "model": {"type": "bpmn:StartEvent", "entryPointId
2026-04-19 12:44:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01L1cKSgoutcntkhjSpDByVR | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow has been updated successfully.
2026-04-19 12:44:23 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_017KTziMk3d1XYVwAjgcZMdD | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate after fixing ent
2026-04-19 12:44:24 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_017KTziMk3d1XYVwAjgcZMdD | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/H
2026-04-19 12:44:45 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="Still failing. The issue is not the `entryPointId`. Let me try a binary search approach - remove half the content and see if it passes. Let me try removing all the non-essentia
2026-04-19 12:44:45 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: The issue might be in the edge format — let me test with edges using `sourceNodeId`/`targetNodeId` as the reference doc specifies:
2026-04-19 12:45:05 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_011Zpe2TmnPKZrHPQrq8wcpB | params={'command': '# Test with edges using sourceNodeId/targetNodeId format\ncat > /tmp/test_edges.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n      "type
2026-04-19 12:45:06 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_011Zpe2TmnPKZrHPQrq8wcpB | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/tmp/test_edges.flow",
    "Status": "Valid"
  }
}
2026-04-19 12:45:09 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking="So the edge format with `sourceNodeId`/`targetNodeId` works. And the original `source`/`target` format also worked in earlier tests (test_hitl4 had empty edges).\n\nLet me now 
2026-04-19 12:45:10 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: `sourceNodeId`/`targetNodeId` works. Let me test whether `source`/`target` format also works with a real edge:
2026-04-19 12:45:19 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01CBm6nSD9kBnuzrFCGNkEaB | params={'command': 'cat > /tmp/test_edges2.flow << \'EOF\'\n{\n  "id": "0adcf9f5-6173-41e7-b159-ae9b1647aa98",\n  "version": "1.0.0",\n  "name": "TestFlow",\n  "nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "start",\n      "type": "core.trigger.manual",\n      "typeVersion": "1.0.0",\n      "ui": {"position": {"x": 256, "
2026-04-19 12:45:20 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [ERROR]: id=toolu_01CBm6nSD9kBnuzrFCGNkEaB | Exit code 1
Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Failure",
  "Message": "Validation failed for /tmp/test_edges2.flow",
  "Instructions": "Found 1 error(s):\n  - [error] [(root)] Schema validation failed: Invalid input: expected string, received undefined"
2026-04-19 12:45:24 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT BLOCK (ThinkingBlock): ThinkingBlock(thinking='The `source`/`target` edge format is the culprit! The edges must use `sourceNodeId`/`targetNodeId` format. My original HROnboarding.flow uses `source`/`target` for the edges, w
2026-04-19 12:45:25 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Found it — the `source`/`target` edge keys are invalid; the schema requires `sourceNodeId`/`targetNodeId`. Let me fix all edges in the flow:
2026-04-19 12:45:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Edit | id=toolu_01AZXfG6HkYBDkGg6KrhB2GX | params={'replace_all': False, 'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow', 'old_string': '  "edges": [\n    {"id": "e1", "source": "trigger1", "ta
2026-04-19 12:45:33 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01AZXfG6HkYBDkGg6KrhB2GX | The file /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow has been updated successfully.
2026-04-19 12:45:36 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Bash | id=toolu_01NgBfmXZinNU14nC3dRwSYM | params={'command': 'cd "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield" && /Users/religa/.bun/bin/uip flow validate HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow 2>&1', 'description': 'Validate flow after fixin
2026-04-19 12:45:37 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_01NgBfmXZinNU14nC3dRwSYM | Tool factory already registered for project type 'Flow', skipping.
{
  "Result": "Success",
  "Code": "FlowValidate",
  "Data": {
    "File": "/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/HROnboardin
2026-04-19 12:45:39 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: **Validation passed.** Now let me write the `report.json`:
2026-04-19 12:45:42 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> TOOL CALL: Write | id=toolu_019wyVmbjkpxLFNw8NSuNirS | params={'file_path': '/Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/report.json', 'content': '{\n  "hitl_nodes": [\n    {\n      "id": "hrDocReview1",\n      "label": "HR Document Review",\n      "before": "
2026-04-19 12:45:42 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< TOOL RESULT [OK]: id=toolu_019wyVmbjkpxLFNw8NSuNirS | File created successfully at: /Users/religa/src/coder_eval/runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/report.json
2026-04-19 12:45:50 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: >>> ASSISTANT: Everything is complete. Here's a summary of what was done:

---

## HR Onboarding Flow — HITL Wiring Complete ✅

### Flow file written
`HROnboarding/HROnboarding/HROnboarding.flow`

### Two HITL nodes inserted

| Node ID | Label | Inserted before |
|---|---|---|
| `hrDocReview1` | HR Document Review | `validateDocs` |
| `managerItApproval1` | Manager IT Approval | `provisionIT` |

**hrDocReview1** — HR officer reviews submitted employee documents:
- Inputs (read-only): Employee Name, Document Ty
2026-04-19 12:45:50 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: <<< RESULT: cost=$1.0671857999999999, usage={'input_tokens': 30, 'cache_creation_input_tokens': 57804, 'cache_read_input_tokens': 1175736, 'output_tokens': 33174, 'server_tool_use': {'web_search_requests': 0, 'web_fetch_requests': 0}, 'service_
2026-04-19 12:45:50 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: session_id changed: None -> 09caa9ed-0a91-4353-9614-ec9e23742069
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [DEBUG] coder_eval.agents.claude_code_agent: Agent query stream ended
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Agent response received (5176 chars)
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [DEBUG] coder_eval.orchestrator: Checking success criteria
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'file_contains' score: 1.00
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'file_contains' score: 1.00
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'command_executed' score: 1.00
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.evaluation.checker: Criterion 'json_check' score: 1.00
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Success criteria: 4/4 passed, weighted score: 1.000
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: All success criteria passed!
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Running post-run command: python3 $SKILLS_REPO_PATH/tests/tasks/uipath-maestro-flow/_shared/cleanup_solutions.py
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [WARNING] coder_eval.orchestrator: [post_run stderr] cleanup_solutions: no .uipx files under cwd; nothing to do.
2026-04-19 12:45:51 [INFO] coder_eval.orchestrator: Sandbox preserved (in-place): runs/2026-04-19_12-09-06/default/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield/artifacts/skill-hitl-e2e-multi-hitl-brownfield